Matthew Lee is the editor-in-chief and webmaster for Inner City Press.  As of February 13th, 2008 Google, Inc. has pulled his website off the search engine's database.  Google claims that it is a technical error that will be fixed.  Yet they sent Matthew Lee an email containing the following.  "We periodically review news sources, particularly following user complaints, to ensure Google News offers a high quality experience for our users ... When we reviewed your site we've found that we can no longer include it in Google News."  The reason Google, Inc. is suspect because they have partnered with the U.N. Development Program.

Inner City Press has released several articles critical of Google, Inc. and their relationship with the U.N. Program.  The Inner City Press has made it their goal to focus on corruption and abuse in the United Nations.  The website has focused specifically on the U.N. Development Program in many articles.  This is why Google is suspect in this misunderstanding and 'glitch' in their program.  They clearly have motive and the ability for this to be more than a glitch.

Google, Inc. is a private corporation and they are free to conduct business however they wish.  However, I agree with Neal Boortz in that anyone who partners up with the United Nations is suspect.  There are many other private charities that Google could have partnered with instead.  I also agree with Neal Boortz in that when American money gets used to help other countries, America should get some of the credit.

Inner City Press
Fox News Article
Neal Boortz

I was watching FOX News today and everyone was up in arms with what Anne Coulter said on Hannity & Combs yesterday.  The question for today was why conservatives hated McCain so much and if we really would vote for Hillary.  Yet not one of their "Analysts" had a klue as to why conservatives will not vote for McCain; Not now, not ever!

However, I will explain in simple terms.  I hope someone out there is listening because hearing their so called analysts ramble on this-that-and-another-thing is annoying. 

1. McCain-Kennedy's Amnesty bill.  I know they called it something else but it was Amnesty and everyone knows it. 
2. McCain-Feingold Bill where McCain showed his true colors and his hatred for freedom of speech in directly targeting and trying to silence Talk Radio because we ruined his little plan to undercut the boarder fence debate by giving another 12 million illegals Amnesty for a third time.  Amnesty did not work the first two times we did it and so I really do not know how they could expect America to just swallow the mularky that they know best. 
3. McCain, Kennedy, and Bush all stood up and literally told America that they did not care that America did not want Amnesty and the tried to shove it down our throats even after we told them no the first time the bill came up.

I have no idea why this is hard to understand.  Yet I will make it absolutely clear that McCain threw away any chance he had at being elected president after the Amnesty fiasco last summer.  Democrats may be all to willing to forget what their politicians have done every year that isn't an election year.  However, conservatives have gotten sick and tired of our politicians lying to us every election year; they say they are the Party of Change and all they have ever done is anything but change.  They seem far more concerned with lining their pockets with special interest money than looking after the best interests of their constituents.  Do understand now how we feel?  We will not vote for McCain even if he is elected the RP nominee.  We would rather have four years of Hillary/Obama than let that Sicko anywhere near the White House.

Maybe I need to make this Dr. Seuth simple. 

2p1k3 I am
I am 2p1k3
I am 2p1k3
2p1k3 I am

That 2p1k3-I-am!
That 2p1k3-I-am!
I like that, 2p1k3-I-am!

Do you like
John McCain as a ham?

I do not like him,
2p1k3-I-am.
I do not like
John McCain as a ham.

Would you like John McCain
here or there?

I would not like him
here or there.
I would not like him
anywhere.
I do not like
John McCain as a ham.
I do not like them,
2p1k3-I-am.

Would you like him
in the House?
Would you like him
with a Mouse?

I do not like him
in the House.
I do not like him
with a Mouse.
I do not like him
here or there.
I do not like him
anywhere.
I do not like John McCain as a ham.
I do not like him, 2p1k3-I-am.

Would you vote for him
in a Box?
Would you vote for him
against a Fox?

Not in a Box.
Not against a Fox.
Not in the House.
Not with a Mouse.
I would not vote here or there.
I would not vote anywhere.
I would not vote John McCain
as a ham.
I do not like him, 2p1k3-I-am.

Would you? Could you?
If that is all there are?
Vote for him! Vote for him!
That is all there are.

I would not,
could not,
if that is all there are.

You may like him.
You will see.
You may like him
If he versus Hillary!

I would not, could not versus Hillary.
Not if that's all there are! You let me be!

I do not like him in a Box
I do not like him against a Fox.
I do not like him in the House.
I do not like him with a Mouse.
I do not like him here or there.
I do not like him ANYWHERE.
I do not like John McCain as ham.
I do not like him, 2p1k3-I-am.

Express! Express!
Express! Express!
Could you, would you,
with a Straight Talk Express?

No Straight Talk! No Straight Talk Express!
Not even against Hillary!
That is not all there are! 2p1k3! Let me be!

I would not, could not, in a Box.
I could not, would not, against a Fox.
I will not vote him with a Mouse.
I will not vote him in the House.
i will not vote him here or there.
I will not vote him anywhere.
I will not vote John McCain as a ham.
I do not like him, 2p1k3-I-am.

Say!
In the dark?
Here in the dark!
Would you, could you, in the dark?

I would not, could not,
in the dark.

Would you, could you,
if he refrains?

I would not, could not, even if he refrains.
Not in the dark. Not on Straight Talk Express.
That is not all there are. Not against Hillary.
I do not like him, 2p1k3, you see.
Not in the House. Not in a Box.
Not with a Mouse. Not against a Fox.
I will not vote for him here or there.
I do not like him anywhere!

You do not like
John McCain as a ham?

I do not
like him,
2p1k3-I-am.

Could you, would you
against a donkey?

I would not,
could not,
against a donkey!

Would you, could you,
just to float?

I could not, would not, just to float.
I will not, will not, against a donkey.
I will not vote if he refrains.
I will not vote with a Straight Talk Express.
Not in the dark! Not against Hillary!
That is not all there are! You let me be!
I do not like him in a Box.
I do not like him against a Fox.
I will not vote him into the House.
I do not like him with a Mouse.
I do not like him here or there.
I do not like him ANYWHERE

I do not like
John McCain
as a ham!

I do not like him,
2p1k3-I-am.

You don't like him.
So you say.
Try him! Try him!
And you may.
Try him and you may, I say.

2p1k3!
If you will let me be,
I will try them.
Thus You'll see.

Say!
I do not like John McCain as ham!
I do not! I do not like them, 2p1k3-I-am!
And I will not vote just to float.
And I will not vote against a donkey...

I will never vote for him if he refrains.
And in the dark. And on a Straight Talk Express.
That is not all there are. Even against Hillary.
He is evil, evil, you will see!

So I will not vote for him in a Box.
And I will not vote for him against a Fox.
And I will not vote him in the House.
And I will not vote for him with a Mouse.
And I will not vote for him here and there.
Say! I will vote for him ANYWHERE!

I will never like
John McCain as ham!
I curse! I curse!
I curse you will see! John McCain
Is not right you see!

I am done with you, John McCain as a ham
I hope! I hope!
I hope & dream! That you will see
How wrong you are
for my country

2p1k3-I-am!

Ever since 1994, America has wanted Washington to change.  Every election cycle, the Democrats and Republicrats traded the "We Are The Party Of Change" and America elects them into power; Yet they prove in their actions, that they want to change nothing.  America needs to wake up and start holding politicians accountable for their actions.  90% of Blacks vote for the Democrats and have for the longest time.  Yet the Democratic Party does nothing for them.  The Democratic Party wants to keep their constituents uneducated and poor because that reduces the risk of their constituents challenging their authority; and it also allows the Democratic Party to tell their constituents what to think because the Democratic Politicians know best.  The Republicrats following McCain is not any better though.  The proof of this is the McCain-Feingold bill that was started after Talk Radio raised awareness regarding the Amnesty bill.  McCain has a very real problem with freedom of speech.  Both parties are more interested in getting paid by special interests than representing their constituents.

To change this, we need to start illustrating what we would do differently.  The primary problem with the Libertarian Party is that all the public seems to ever be aware of is that we are for Anarchy.  The American public will never vote for Anarchy.  The LP turns off voters who want to actually find the truth by focusing on everything they don't like; The LP is against Universal Health Care, the war in Iraq, government entitlement programs.  Instead we need to focus on what we would do differently.  Every candidate should be able to find their own unique way to solving every problem.  Yet that does not mean we can not give examples of possible solutions we are in favor.  How would we defend our country against Terrorism?  How would we create universal health care without the government giving it to us?  How would we help people who obviously need help without providing government handouts like Healthcare and Social Security?  That is what we need to focus on relaying to the public and it is what would turn many more Americans in favor of Libertarianism.  Half of the Democratic Party's constituents identify themselves as Liberals because they want freedom.  They are just too uneducated to realize that the Democratic Party is not giving it too them.  They have been taught all their lives that they need a savior to look up too.  Instead we need to show people that they are their own saviors.  That the divine is inside of them and that they do not need a priest, or a book, to tell the what to think.  As they say in the Matrix; We need to help them free their minds.  

The only way to do that is to believe in them.  We need to be positive and show them how.  Libertarians need to fight for control of Hollywood from the communists; and then we can have more movies that show people how they are their own savior.  You may baulk at the idea of movies with messages but that is what a large portion of humanity wants.  Humanity is so thirsty for change that they will even drink the sand because someone tricked them into thinking it was water.  This is not the only problem though.  The Libertarian Party needs to focus on what the populous wants instead of Libertarian ideals.  Our ideals are what you use to guide your philosophy;  I think that people mistake the two for being the same but they are not.  The war in Iraq is a great example of this.  I disagree with a lot of things George W. Bush has done but going into Iraq is not one of them.  We did a good thing with getting rid of Saddam and we are doing a good thing by finishing the job there.  There are evil people in the world who want nothing more than to kill those who refuse to be subjugated.  

The war on the Islamic Nations is not over.  Everyone seems to want to tip toe around what everyone knows and that is Islam is a backwards religion.  Sure the Catholics, were not very different from Islam back in the day but Christianity has grew and it spawned Libertarian ideals... Ever read the Federalist Papers?  Or investigated what Freemasonry Ideals are?  Freemasonry created America and the American Dream [b]is[/b] a Freemasonry Dream.  Our founding fathers knew that there were some things worth fighting for; worth dieing for.  I just wish more people today understood that.  Anyhow, I have no problem with people holding whatever religious views they wish but the moment they try to make the religion a government; There are problems.  Pakistan, Iran, and Syria are all problems and the sooner we face why they are, the better.  Diplomacy only works when both sides are interested in peaceful coexistence.  Islamic Fundamentalism has no interest in peace; their suicide bombers prove that they are perfectly willing to throw their own life away just to see their own people die let alone someone who doesn't follow Islam.  They are diametrically opposed to all Libertarian ideals.  

I am frankly appalled that the LP has an Anti-War stance.  Islamic Fundamentalism has proven that they are willing and able to come and kill American citizens; If only, because we believe in freedom and are not willing to let them rule us.  They have proven that they are against the very idea of Freedom and Equality for all.  American foreign policy did have an effect on 9/11, however we are not at fault for 9/11.  I agree that a plane did not hit the Pentagon and yet I do not agree that our government killed three thousand people, just to start a war.  People seem so willing to think ill of our government and yet they take no ownership for their own actions.  American citizens are the ones who have given Congress a 90% re-election rate.  If you want to know who is really at fault for politicians not careing about their constituents, you only need to look in the mirror.

www.lp.org

www.libertarianunderground.com